Only for people who don't understand feminism. The crap being served up by the majority of big legacy media? That's not feminism, Radical or otherwise.
If your argument is that modern feminism is insufficiently marxist you're fucking delusional.
Please be kidding. 




-
-
You obviously don't know the meaning of the word, or understand class analysis.
-
I do actually, which is why I can say that both strains of feminism are pseudomarxist claptrap which crudely misapply marxian class theory onto demographic/social groups and expect the analysis to be valid. "Economic oppression" tautologically follows from being an employee.
-
"Gendered oppression" does not tautologically follow from having a vagina, no matter how much radfems insist it does. It's sad that I have to explain these basic concepts to you.
-
You don't backup your assertion with any evidence or rhetoric so you have explained exactly zero.
-
Do you know what 'tautologically' means? You not understanding my explanation doesn't negate its existence.
-
You offer no evidence. It's not possible to understand an argument that hasn't been presented.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.