"You assume too much" said the person engaging in leaps of faith in order to vilify an app and its userbase based on the actions of a single user. You're not fooling anyone. The reason you're unhappy about this convo is because it confronted you with your irrational argument.
-
-
You never confronted any point, lol. Also, doth thou cast stones while in a house of glass? You assumed I was going towards proposing censoring the app, which is why you questioned me on it. You also assumed that I would defend Twitter or Facebook, which is laughable.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not only did you not understand my initial tweet, you must not know what implicitly means. If I tried to get Twitter to apply its' standards fairly, and it doesn't, it means Twitter's personnel doesn't listen. You really lack reading comprehension.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @__Sheik_ @Banned_Ali and
You just keep on assuming so much, it's practically all your "argument" is based on. Assumption.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You're literally insisting that jokes somehow are involved in a mass murder but sure I'm the one making wacky assumptions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm insisting that an obsessed anti-Semite, who actually decided to kill people, also made anti-Semitic jokes. You brought the topic to censorship, not I. You brought up villification of an app, not I. I drew an example, and you went left field. I then clarified, and you derailed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You're too much of a coward to actually make the argument you're plainly implying. That doesn't mean that's not your argument. "I think there's a correlation between obsession over a group of people and violence." - you
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Key word: Obsession. Continually joking about one group (at their expense) contributes (slightly) to an obsession. You're assuming implication. Once again, not understanding what I said. It's heartbreaking to watch you do mental gymnastics to think I said/implied anything else.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If your argument is that actually your point was completely meaningless then, sure, I guess, go with that. If not then by all means explain to me exactly what the point of that tweet was if not to imply causation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh and you're still doing it BTW. Only now you're using the word "obsession" as an intermediate step so as to obfuscate the obvious suggestion that jokes lead to shootings. You're as pathetic as you are transparent. Have the spine to own your argument, coward.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.