I'd be co-responsible if I definitely had a link with Elliot Rodger. Something like, I dunno, friends and feed could definitely help with that one. But you conveniently seemed to sidestep that part of my hypothetical.
You're literally insisting that jokes somehow are involved in a mass murder but sure I'm the one making wacky assumptions.
-
-
I'm insisting that an obsessed anti-Semite, who actually decided to kill people, also made anti-Semitic jokes. You brought the topic to censorship, not I. You brought up villification of an app, not I. I drew an example, and you went left field. I then clarified, and you derailed
-
You're too much of a coward to actually make the argument you're plainly implying. That doesn't mean that's not your argument. "I think there's a correlation between obsession over a group of people and violence." - you
-
Key word: Obsession. Continually joking about one group (at their expense) contributes (slightly) to an obsession. You're assuming implication. Once again, not understanding what I said. It's heartbreaking to watch you do mental gymnastics to think I said/implied anything else.
-
If your argument is that actually your point was completely meaningless then, sure, I guess, go with that. If not then by all means explain to me exactly what the point of that tweet was if not to imply causation.
-
Pointing out correlation doesn't imply causation. Or did that slip your mind while you were carefully crafting your tweets? I know you've heard that one before, so take it in.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Going back to the original point, I just find it unusual that you'd see nothing wrong with mocking Jesus Christ. Am I correct in assuming that you're Christian?
-
No you aren't. Furthermore there are plenty of christians who don't want to enforce theocracy, friend.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.