Regarding the Diablo controversy. What we have here isn't 'entitled gamers' (and when you pay for a product, you're entitled to your money's worth anyway) but a deep loss of trust and respect between gamers, media and developers.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Grimasaur
The feminist narrative/buzzword "entitlement" has always been ridiculous in the context of consumers and the companies that cater to them. Consumption is driven by consumer needs and desires. A consumer is *by definition* "entitled".
2 replies 3 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Grimasaur
I'd go even further tha that and say that "entitlement" really is just the Russell conjugation of, well, having standards, needs and desires. In other words, they're vilifying people for being human.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Grimasaur
It's very telling how these puritanical "progressives" who behave more like the religious "right" have also appropriated elements of the "right's" language, such as "entitlement" to mean self-entitled, which was originally used by right-wingers to dismiss welfare recipients.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Vision_Storm @Grimasaur
I wasn't aware of that specific example, but yes their arguments tend to be very similar: spooky brainwashing by media&entertainment, words and art constituting "harm", "protect the children/wammen!", etc. I suspect it comes down to the wiring of the brain, and how outrage...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
... as an emotion is tied to disgust (of excrement, rot, filth, bodily fluids) as a gut reaction.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Grimasaur
Yeah, I think this is tied deep to an aspect of human psychology that deals with enforcing morality, shaming others and such. It used to be that people with that type of moralistic tendency were in the religious right, now they're in the Intersectional left.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Probably cuz the main source of morality at least in the Western world used to be Christianity (the Religious Right), and now it's "anti-bigotry", which has been taken over by Intersectional Feminism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Vision_Storm @Grimasaur
I realise I wasn't quite clear in my earlier tweet, but I think it goes back way further than that. I think outrage is an *extremely* primitive tool of enforcing social cohesion, likely predating organised religion by thousands of years if not more.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
IMO that is why outrage is often fuelled by irrational leaps of logic, like the magical thinking involved in blaming [cultural phenomenon] for [bad thing]. It's scapegoating (and in the past this was done quite literally).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I think outrage as a response developed so far back in the past that it is triggered by the types of cues that would've been most threatening back then: primal fears, threats to the weak of the tribe, magical phenomena and monsters.
-
-
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Grimasaur
That's what I meant by "tied deep to an aspect of human psychology". I think this transcends religion and is probably tied to primitive gut reactions, at a level were people behave more by instinct.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.