It's not that much compared to the usual amount. + as someone else stated, what headline will more likely lose them consistent donors? "ST Jude's accepts donations from the alt-right" or "ST Jude refunds donations from the alt-right"? The 1st one would be a huge mess for them.
What part of the transaction do you have moral qualms with, and why: Pedophiles becoming poorer or cancer research getting more funding? So far your only """argument""" has been a kneejerk disgust reflex, and I'm sorry, going "ewwww gross" isn't an argument.
-
-
No one said st jude doesn't have the right to refuse money, I'm saying it isn't right. But I'll go further than that: it goes against their mission to refuse money for "optics" or w/e. A charity that's in the habit of refusing money for petty reasons isn't doing its fucking job.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.