Silencing Women in the Name of Trans Activism https://quillette.com/2018/10/31/silencing-women-in-the-name-of-trans-activism/ … via @QuilletteM
Pretty much all contemporary feminism is radical. In that sense the term has become a bit meaningless.
-
-
Only for people who don't understand feminism. The crap being served up by the majority of big legacy media? That's not feminism, Radical or otherwise.
-
So tell me, what's a REAL Scotsman like then?
-
Wow there's something you see literally every day, as smart ass Kekistani.
#boring -
An ad hominem argument then? How sad.
-
Better than a false analogy.
-
You made an explicit no true scotsman fallacy. If you want to refute that point you're going to have to specify exactly how all this mainstream feminism stuff isn't *REAL* feminism. Either that or just accept your fallacious reasoning.
-
Ppl who calls for the enslavement of all women in the homes of their husbands' families can call themselves feminists, it won't make it true. Just like Linda Sarsour can call herself one: Still not true. This reasoning not
#notruescotsman. Get your logical phallusies straight. -
Again your inability to define feminism or explain how the feminists-you-don't-like don't fit your criteria makes this the definition of a no-true-scotsman fallacy. If you're going to adhere to a cult, at least figure out what your principles are, you goof.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.