Yeah there's no way I'm going to support this message. If you honestly want money to go to charity, you will promote another method that people can use to donate. I disagree with both sides of this thing.pic.twitter.com/k1K3x47XkF
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The problem is that Ralph obviously doesn't give a damn about those kids. This is not an act of charity, it's a political weapon. Some good can be done in the name of political weaponization, but it doesn't mean Ralph is some good person who cares about kids.
I don't think you can make that determination based on these events but even if that were the case, he's not the one who threw a spanner into the gears. He's not the one preventing the cancer kids from receiving the money, so to get mad at him is just tribal BS.
I'm not mad at him. I'm just pointing out that not making any sort of effort to circumvent Youtube's weird superchat moderation is selfishness. Obviously it would be better if Youtube never decided to reject these donations.
It's not YT doing these refunds, it's st Judes. This doesn't have anything to do with superchat moderation, if I had to guess the WSJ pestered the hospital's communications/PR dept to disavow the icky gross racist donations and they cucked.
But even if it were YT's fault, that's still some A+ victim blaming to blame the censored for having their speech stifled. Why.
Ralph isn't a victim here, the kids are.
They both are.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.