I'm not moving the goalposts at all. I'm addressing your argument directly. You're trying to argue that intersectional feminism is antifeminist for acknowledging an aspect of reality that runs counter to your ideology, to whit, psychological sex differences.
The intersection of race and sex is BUT A SINGLE EXAMPLE of intersectionality. All squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are square. The concept extends to literally any other avenue of identity and/or oppression: class, sexuality, (dis)ability, etc. etc. etc.
-
-
PS feeling insulted isn't an argument. All of feminism is ahistorical and ridiculous, so again, not an argument. Do better.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.