Arguing for biological sex differences while denying psychological sex differences is not significantly less kooky than denying biological sex differences. Again you're just assuming a priori that your strain of feminism is right.
Intersectionality is why trans issues are now considered feminist issues ya doof. If you have a problem with the latter you have a problem with the former.
-
-
No it's not. The woman (Kimberlé Crenshaw) who came up with the term/theory of 'intersectionality' explains what it means quite clearly. You clearly have not read her work. Trying to equate white men who want to be women to woc is ridiculous, ahistorical, and insulting.
-
The intersection of race and sex is BUT A SINGLE EXAMPLE of intersectionality. All squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are square. The concept extends to literally any other avenue of identity and/or oppression: class, sexuality, (dis)ability, etc. etc. etc.
-
PS feeling insulted isn't an argument. All of feminism is ahistorical and ridiculous, so again, not an argument. Do better.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.