If you want to delude yourself into thinking that every feminist who disagrees with your specific brand of feminism is a useful idiot or a cynical enemy agent, you do you I guess. I think this is silly, plainly self-serving and ultimately counterproductive.
I skimmed them, encountered nothing I haven't seen before and responded to your overall points accordingly. If there's any specific argument you think I'm overlooking, name it, if not, stop deflecting to those articles.
-
-
You are now asking me to justify the existence of feminism, not to defend my position on gender identity. This is an entirely separate argument than the one you began with. I'm on my way out, and honestly not interested, atm, in defending the existence of feminism on twitter
-
Nothing of the sort. I'm asking you to explain your endlessly repeated assertion that intersectional feminism is antifeminist. The fact that this is such a nettling question for you to answer should be a red flag that maybe you need to rethink this issue.
-
"Intersectional feminism" isn't anti-feminist. Intersectionality is about understanding that women of colour are oppressed in more than one way, not just via patriarchy, but via white supremacy.
-
You are intentionally misrepresenting my words and arguments. My arguments against gender identity ideology and explaining how gender identity is anti-feminist are clear. You just keep trying to manipulate this into a different convo.
-
I'm not misrepresenting anything. You're getting very agitated about being questioned on extremely basic points of doctrine. It's embarrassing really. It's painfully obvious that you've relied far too much on the crutch of calling people-you-dislike antifeminists.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.