They disagree, but cannot defend their claims/arguments, which are illogical. Arguing that gender is innate and that women's oppression is not sex-based is ignorant. Sure, they say they're feminist, but their actions and arguments show otherwise.
If you want to delude yourself into thinking that every feminist who disagrees with your specific brand of feminism is a useful idiot or a cynical enemy agent, you do you I guess. I think this is silly, plainly self-serving and ultimately counterproductive.
-
-
They literally cannot define their own terms. I've asked, over and over again: what is a woman? What is trans? Feminism aside, their arguments are irrational and incoherent.
-
I'm not here to defend intersectional feminism. As I said at the outset, I disagree with both camps of feminism in this fight. My point is that it's ridiculous to frame the other side as antifeminist just because they have differing beliefs regarding what constitutes womanhood.
-
No it's not. Feminism is a specific analysis. It argues that women are not stereotypes -- we are not, for example, inherently passive, irrational, or emotional. If you argue that women are stereotypes and inherently 'feminine', that is an anti-feminist argument.
-
Arguing for biological sex differences while denying psychological sex differences is not significantly less kooky than denying biological sex differences. Again you're just assuming a priori that your strain of feminism is right.
-
You're moving the goalposts. I'm just explaining to you what the feminist analysis of gender is. You are free to disagree if you like.
-
I'm not moving the goalposts at all. I'm addressing your argument directly. You're trying to argue that intersectional feminism is antifeminist for acknowledging an aspect of reality that runs counter to your ideology, to whit, psychological sex differences.
-
I'm arguing that proponents of gender identity ideology are not making feminist (or coherent) arguments.
-
And I'm pointing out that coherence or factuality has never been a requirement of feminism. You can dislike or disagree with the intersectionals all you want, so far you've given no argument other than naked assertion that they aren't feminists.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.