Disappointed but unsurprised to see NYT "science" pushing us further down the slippery slope of progressive antiscience nonsense. You spent years arguing that sex and gender aren't the same. Fine. So don't treat them as synonyms.https://twitter.com/NYTScience/status/1054571886598873088 …
-
Show this thread
-
How this works: 1. "OK fine biological sex is real but sex and gender aren't the same. Gender is the sex of your brain." 2. "How very dare you conflate sex with genitalia, think of the transpeople!" 3. "Well acksheüllly, biological sex isn't real. Read a book."
4 replies 14 retweets 52 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @AntisocialJW2
This entire outrage over trump's planned sex-assignement policy proves this
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KeenGaze @AntisocialJW2
I haven't followed it very closely but apparently he wants to define 'sex' as biological sex? What a monster, actually listening to the LGBT crowd and giving them what they claimed to want! Outrage!
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @AntisocialJW2
Anyone who is angry about this is either misinformed or angry they can't put down one of their 483959 genders as an excuse to get special treatment.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
I think a lot of it is just generic TDS. Orange Man Bad and all that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.