Disappointed but unsurprised to see NYT "science" pushing us further down the slippery slope of progressive antiscience nonsense. You spent years arguing that sex and gender aren't the same. Fine. So don't treat them as synonyms.https://twitter.com/NYTScience/status/1054571886598873088 …
-
Show this thread
-
How this works: 1. "OK fine biological sex is real but sex and gender aren't the same. Gender is the sex of your brain." 2. "How very dare you conflate sex with genitalia, think of the transpeople!" 3. "Well acksheüllly, biological sex isn't real. Read a book."
4 replies 14 retweets 52 likesShow this thread -
-
Replying to @yelloJoltacious
Perfect meme. Stolen. When people cannot summarise complex ideas it's a huge red flag that really, they're just regurgitating shit they don't understand, if not out-and-out bullshit.
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @yelloJoltacious
Most of their "ideas" aren't complicated so much as counter-intuitive.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DoctorDeadpool @yelloJoltacious
Postmodernism and all derivations (including academic feminism, social justice, intersectionality, all that jazz) explicitly hides its intellectual vapidity behind a veneer of complexity. No postmodernist worth his salt writes in plain English, it's all arcane gobbledygook.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
The purpose is not to explain or enlighten, but to make the audience think "I don't get this, so it must be very very clever". In other words, it's the emperor's new clothes gambit.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.