Disappointed but unsurprised to see NYT "science" pushing us further down the slippery slope of progressive antiscience nonsense. You spent years arguing that sex and gender aren't the same. Fine. So don't treat them as synonyms.https://twitter.com/NYTScience/status/1054571886598873088 …
-
-
The purpose is not to explain or enlighten, but to make the audience think "I don't get this, so it must be very very clever". In other words, it's the emperor's new clothes gambit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This makes them feel smart.
-
It's the mediocre mind LARPing as an actually intelligent person by purposefully making others feel stupid. I am genuinely at a loss how this could have taken root in academia of all places.
-
It's just corruption, plain and simple. Never trust any institution that tries to position itself above scrutiny.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.