YouTube banned a vegan dude who rescued pigeons and produced carefully worded content specifically designed not to violate their TOS. No reason given.
Ludicrous and proof of flagrant partisan censorship of conservatives.
RT if you think @TeamYouTube should restore his account.
I just said, they're liable. Or rather you did. You said it's a private website, so any child porn, terrorism, etc becomes their liability That's the law. I mean if they were a utility aka PLATFORM it wouldn't, but than they can't ban people as that's assault and discrimination
-
-
Meaning, they can ban you for whatever reason they want. It's not state censorship, it's the rules EVERYONE accepts when making a YT account, it's not hard.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What are you on about? A Platform CAN ban people if they break their ToS, that's what they are there for. Plus I never said that "it's a private website", I said it's a privately owned company. They can make up their own ToS, as long as it isn't against national law.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.