freaked out by people who think consequentialism is "true" or "correct" instead of a useful tool
David Deutsch might argue that consequentialism is "correct" ("fundamental", he'd say) only from a multiversal perspective
-
-
in this perspective, antisocial actions happening to lead to positive outcomes will be balanced out by realities in which they
-
wind up hurting people. Only "good intentions" will tend to lead to positive outcomes across all realities
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.