Apparent contradiction: - reported duration of novel stimuli longer than conditioned stimuli - time crawls by when you're bored
-
I imagine the former reports are made post-hoc, the latter made during or before the experience
My guess- if subjects incentivized to give *correct* time estimates, difference disappears. Latter is serving emotional need
-
-
the experiment has stim on scale of 500 ms, questions on scale of ~10s, shorter than scale of boredom http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0001264 …pic.twitter.com/u35s7WltfG
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
incentivizing is interesting q tho- could correct stopped clock illusion, but only b/c of strong prior that clock is correct
-
see here for stopped clock illusion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronostasis …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.