There is an overlooked subpopulation of folks who are risk-averse in novel situations, but "warm up" to extreme risk nonimpulsively
-
It is harder to fit their narrative into a framework with a clear irrational point-of-no-return
They often won't have been in a highly emotional/distressed/impulsive state at the time of the event
-
-
The popular "safety" strategy of post-hoc dissociation with said state is therefore inapplicable, falling on deaf ears
-
As far as they can tell, the person they are now is the same person who did the deed. It does not feel "extreme", even now
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.