might be me playing at being special but if i saw someone do/express something i thought was specific to me i wouldn't be all
-
-
Replying to @fire__exit @BagelDaughter
"wow i thought iiii was the only one!!" i'd be like "why did you do that, how did you learn that" unless it was mundane
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fire__exit
I think there are two responses- first is that curiosity you just described. Truth/meaning-seeking
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BagelDaughter @fire__exit
second is personal/relational validation of the experience, for the original person's sake. Legitimate & necessary, & personal
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BagelDaughter @fire__exit
but a lot of ppl lose sight of the purpose of the second thing, and learn poor strategies for supporting each other
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @BagelDaughter
hah, i forgot it has a name. you think an abbreviation means the actual act has died?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fire__exit
might hmm, maybe. I find myself looking for nonstandard phrasings of things when trying to say something genuine & heartfelt
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BagelDaughter
maybe signalling "this was important enough to put effort into phrasing it"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fire__exit
yeah... Unfortunate that in truth-seeking saying the same old thing is bad but in giving care it's what we mostly need
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
"I don't really believe you love me because you said it boring"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.