-
-
Moreover, the "study intervention" means the vaccine. These sentences refers to, for example, healthcare workers who might have dropped some of the vaccine on their skin. The protocol requires their data to be collected. The "study intervention" is not touching vaccinated people.pic.twitter.com/q4s9lN12la
Show this thread -
So, no, Pfizer did not "warn men to stay away from pregnant women," much less that the "results were devastating." The protocol just describes what events will be reported. It's good that it sweeps broadly. Don't get vaccine news from Xia Brookside.pic.twitter.com/gB3GY8htB7
Show this thread -
Here
@gorskon wrote a survey of "shedding" claims, which have roots in older antivax tropes.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-nonsense/ …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
lol nice try, chief
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
To sum it up you are saying I can’t get a close contact vaccine high?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which is absolutely standard practice. Every pregnancy occurring during any clinical trial is reported with a special form, is monitored if the pregnant person agrees, and the outcome is documented in the trial report. This provides data on teratogenicity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This appears to be boilerplate for clinical trials, mRNA or otherwise.
-
Yeah after I first saw someone share this screenshot as proof of shedding I looked it up myself and found several studies with the same almost identical protocols
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.