As the lead author on this working paper, I wanted to comment on some of these criticisms https://twitter.com/ScottClif/status/897867809765588992 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @psforscher
1. I decided to post the working paper prior to the events at Charlottesville. I didn't realize the paper would blow up to the extent it did
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @psforscher
I did agree to the interview with
@B_resnick, but again did not foresee the extensive (and still ongoing) media coverage1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @psforscher @B_resnick
I've decided to decline additional interviews, but I realize that the work is out there and I don't control who picks up the work from here
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @psforscher @B_resnick
2. One of the major reasons I decided to post this as a working paper is to solicit feedback. I'm open to the possibility the work is flawed
2 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @psforscher @B_resnick
Also, there is something to be said about the sheer volume of peer reviews you have now received for free.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SpartanMindPsy @B_resnick
Brian reached out to us and I gave an interview. I wasn't expecting to gain quite so much traction, but Brian's piece is very good
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @psforscher @B_resnick
Quite amazing he found it amongst the sea of tweets. Congrats to you both.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SpartanMindPsy @psforscher
I follow a lot of psychologists! Nice to gauge story ideas by looking at what you all are interested in / are talking about.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
certainly better, more useful, and more clear-eyed than press released!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.