That this was published without serious qualification says bad things about data journalism's promise to be different.
-
-
Replying to @bshor @ScottClif
normally might agree. but, a) this is NOT not published (clearly labelled as working paper and does include quals) and
@psforscher has 1/31 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @dan_a_chapman @bshor and
been welcome to critique. Further,
@B_resnick coverage in the article clearly marks caveats/caution. Yes, data journalism can be bad 2/31 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @dan_a_chapman @bshor and
but in my exp this has been better than many, even if I might not agree with everything in the analysis. why not suggest mods for ppr? 3/3
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @dan_a_chapman @bshor and
hey! so the authors do note that the mturk sample is a limitation. (And they seem completely open to feedback. hence preprint). They did ...
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @B_resnick @dan_a_chapman and
... do a few checks. Like asking after the survey was done, and the participants had been paid, if they answered alt right just to get $...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @B_resnick @dan_a_chapman and
...they got paid already, so I'm told there's little incentive to lie. They also had participants free respond to "describe the movement"
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @B_resnick @dan_a_chapman and
... and looked for people just copy-pasting from wikipedia ... It's not perfect. And I tried to be careful writing this all up.
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
the kicker quote of the story "this isn't the end all be all" is true. For me, it's interesting that they're asking these questions. ...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.