You've ovisously never worked nights or endless shifts if you consider an hours change twice a year as 'dangerous'.
-
-
-
Those things are quite dangerous for the people who do them. DST is less dangerous, but affects way more people.
-
Well it's 2017 so I need statistics over semantics.
-
DST is *slightly* dangerous. But yes, chronic sleep disruptions are worse. I've covered:https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/10/the-black-white-sleep-gap/454311/ …
-
That's semantics, I need numbers baby.
-
No problem. We'll do a controlled study where half of the population is assigned to daylight savings... oh wait.
-
Why are you being silly?
-
Not being silly. There surely aren't any longitudinal studies of the life effects of chronic small amounts of sleep deprivation.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There's more than one reason, I imagine. But this is a start.
-
I mean, some of us also have experienced 4 flights and a birthday in the last 60 hours
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
In Europe, we get two more weeks before DST happens. The least mis-matched working days of the year. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM16/paper/view/13080/12826 …pic.twitter.com/doh8UCrboH
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Daylight Savings hasn't happened where I live yet, so it's like the world is on staggered jet lag.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
God I wish we could end this nonsense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.