Also good advice for most peoplehttps://twitter.com/voxdotcom/status/760918176293150725 …
-
-
another example here (People who get more blood die more frequently): http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1485987 …pic.twitter.com/1HarTGlqR9
-
and not just because people who get more blood have a more severe reason they need blood?
-
Therefore I wonder if you continuously transfuse yourself with someone else's blood, are you harming your long term health?
-
huh. Interesting question. Anything good written in non academic pubs on this blood amt question?
-
Haven't seen much. Some stuff on medscape. Article here talks about it in context of Jehovahs witnesses http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/should-anyone-be-given-a-blood-transfusion …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"restricted"=limiting transf until truly needed. "Liberal"=transfuse more freely (technical article here http://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(13)00841-3/fulltext …)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Although there have been other studies that question this, and show no adverse effects to increased transfusion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.