"If prediction-market participants could collectively identify reliable results, why couldn’t the scientists who initially reviewed those papers, or the journal editors who decided to publish them?"https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/scientists-can-collectively-sense-which-psychology-studies-are-weak/568630/ …
-
Show this thread
-
good question from
@edyong209 's piece on the latest replication paper. Is it possible that these prediction markets only work now because scientists have seen which studies haven't replicated, and have learned.1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
like just based on reading psychology news about the replication crisis, I wouldn't bet on a study involving social priming.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
so: do these prediction markets only work among researchers who have been paying attention?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
“It’s not clear to me that if we had run the markets 10 years ago, people would have been as good.”https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/scientists-can-collectively-sense-which-psychology-studies-are-weak/568630/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.