"If prediction-market participants could collectively identify reliable results, why couldn’t the scientists who initially reviewed those papers, or the journal editors who decided to publish them?"https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/scientists-can-collectively-sense-which-psychology-studies-are-weak/568630/ …
-
-
like just based on reading psychology news about the replication crisis, I wouldn't bet on a study involving social priming.
Show this thread -
so: do these prediction markets only work among researchers who have been paying attention?
Show this thread -
“It’s not clear to me that if we had run the markets 10 years ago, people would have been as good.”https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/scientists-can-collectively-sense-which-psychology-studies-are-weak/568630/ …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.