Not a number but Tupper's self-referential formula is pretty cool. It's an equation that visually reproduces the formula at specific values.
-
-
-
interesting. Have a good link to more info?
-
The wiki has a nice explanation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupper%27s_self-referential_formula …
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
let me be the first to say .......... 420.
-
haha. i was thinking more like "infinity" ... but then, people into 420 might be into that too
-
ahaha I figured, but I can't resist a dumb twitter joke. (fwiw I would be very interested in something on the inexplicably satisfying nature of low prime numbers, like 3 and 5)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seriously tho, cool as numbers are, I’ve loved your placebo, pain,and brain stuff. How about this one: “Inflammation” has been capturing my curiousity lately, esp. in its uniquity and domain-crossing manifestations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about something about the appeal of numbers’ tangibility and certainty, in a complex and unpredictable world? Oh, you said “fun.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
17. When reaching for a random number, people pick 17 more often than any other.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m constantly drawn to 37 1/2. No idea why. Anyone know?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.