The note about Dweck, Mischel, Frederickson, and so on, is also strange because the main thing that unites these people is that they're highly eminent people. Are we to understand then once a person reaches a certain level of eminence, criticism is out of bounds?
-
-
so I'm not exactly sure what he was getting at by mentioning the other instances of reviewing past work.
-
I also recognize that each "replication crisis" story is different from one another. Like, what happened recently with the marshmallow test, i think, is a nice example of how more data can paint a conclusion in a new light (and that mischel et al weren't wrong perse).
-
And I know less about growth mindset. But there seems to be really interesting / rigorous efforts to dig into when the interventions work and why. What's happening with the prison experiment is a totally different type of story.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think it’s clear that our response is not driven by malice either. We’re simply trying to get to the bottom of the story and debate the issues. He also conveniently overlooks his own “virulent attacks” on us, while stubbornly refusing to engage with our theoretical arguments.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.