Two major Stanford psychology studies have been cut down to size recently. But the reasons why couldn't be more different. The Marshmallow Test story shows science as it ought to work https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/6/6/17413000/marshmallow-test-replication-mischel-psychology … The prison experiment story is something murkierhttps://www.vox.com/2018/6/13/17449118/stanford-prison-experiment-fraud-psychology-replication …
I think it has been most often cited as an example of a study with questionable ethics, or of a less-than-scientific demonstration of some dramatic ideas. The new reporting shows Zimbardo and co heavily influenced the outcome .
-
-
so not only it is a study of questionable scientific value, it's also, a bit of a sham. This is the piece that broke the story:https://medium.com/s/trustissues/the-lifespan-of-a-lie-d869212b1f62 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.