Removing people from a platform for documenting a tragedy is immoral, and removing anyone simply because you don’t think they can generate the mass appeal that a squeaky clean, PC channel that supports your desired image can is a blatant attack on free speech.
I’m not sure what the plan would be if @TeamYouTube let itself get to a point where there are more spiderman and elsa videos than artistic, creative content made by passionate people.
-
-
Show this thread
-
-
I think that many will agree that they don’t want to be part of a platform that blatantly censors creators for producing content that could even remotely be construed as controversial
@TeamYouTubeShow this thread -
The only problem is that there is nowhere else with the kind of video hosting power that
@TeamYouTube has right now. Where will we all go when YT inevitably bows down to their corporate sponsors like Network Television has??Show this thread -
The reason the masses went to the internet in the first place was for a freedom of expression that was strickly forbidden on TV.
Show this thread -
By taking down Mumkey in the manner they did
@TeamYouTube is advertising that they support censorship and some watered down image they deem the most profitable and not the core user base that brought youtube millions of users in the first place.Show this thread -
Youtube is clearly trying to send a message with the way they took down
@VincentHatesGod and I do no support it. And@YouTube is IMMENSELY out of touch with its users if they think they made the right call here.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
