The election is in danger of he said v she said on police cuts. Someone needs to provide robust, verifiable data.
-
-
-
Published annually by Home Office. Last stats July 16. All there..
-
Yes but not being shouted about / loudly enough!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Corbyn consistently says he wants judicial oversight, not executive order. His vote prevents Diane Abbott (or similar) having such power
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
I don't understand this BS! What benefit is there to having unarmed police EVER???
-
Lovely friendly armed police in Bury st Edmunds 10 days ago. Definitely made us feel safer, not threatened!
-
Well, that's good! Still think police should carry guns...
-
Because the police have had a tendency to shoot the wrong people (one of those shot in London wasn't a terrorist).
-
And if they hadnt shot the terrorists there would be a lot more dead and injured people.
-
Yes, and if all police were regularly armed, far more innocent people would be killed without a general improvement in public safety.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ok, that's a single cut. What's the record since 2010?
-
Close to a 1300 drop whilst TM was in control? Tories have some cheek
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And I wonder which Islington MP enthusiastically supported those cuts...
-
If you know anything about politics then you would know Corbyn opposed Blair much more than Conservative MP's did.
-
And.....
-
You've missed the context but I wouldn't expect anything else from 'Boy from Space'
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.