Cuz I have seen his supporters say incarceration not the answer in public cases that involved those crimes. Why denounce anyone who disagrees with you as reactionary? Picking a fight? If we are gonna incarcerate for economic crimes we should do the same for violent ones.
-
-
I’ve answered your question to ME in a reply, didn’t call you reactionary. Possibly you’re lumping all Chesa supporters as one person. If your question is sincere you might get better educated outside of twiiter. It’s good to make a sincere effort.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
Ironic you would be upset about lumping people into a category and treating them as one person when that is exactly what you did in your original comment.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oh I see, I mentioned reactionary replies. The replies are reactionary, my opinion, including yours, bc they heighten argument rather than discussion. Your question belies your anger at something else entirely.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
The only thing I am angry at are hypocrites. I want us to be able to respectfully disagree w/o it meaning someone's human rights or humanity are violated.. I do appreciate that most of your comments (except the first) did seem focused on education rather than instigation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I’m unable to have same respect for your comments, which feel of hidden agenda, lean toward insult, and derail/confuse the focus. Tactics of recallers. Recall of elected DA would cost millions. If you live in SF I encourage you to learn and care about this issue.
#StandWithChesa1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
Sorry you feel that way. As stated, I do not have a preference on the Chesa recall one way or the other. I think there have been too many extenuating circumstances for his policies to have a clear read. I do note only one side has been committing criminal voter interference tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Spider sense tells me you want to argue yet another point so you can feel good about winning . . . or just arguing. Maybe is just the arguing that folks get addicted to. Sincerity is what’s lacking here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
I don't think it's fair to say I lack sincerity. I was very open about how I want the collective us to be able to disagree respectfully. For that to happen we need to argue. Argument *can* be constructive when done respectfully, it just seems like people have forgotten how.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
For me your comments cling to argument. There’s some snarky baiting thrown in to fuel argument. Argument is not the same as respectful discussion or creative solution. Especially on Twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
You're correct. It is argument bait. Because as I said, I want us to reach a place where we can argue respectfully and be okay with our disagreement. It sounds like you want everyone to agree, and to agree with what you believe. I wish you the best of luck in that endeavor.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


not libertarian as in taxes are theft but libertarian as in give the f
king land back