Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
BSR163's profile
BSR
BSR
BSR
@BSR163

Tweets

BSR

@BSR163

UK Labour/Corbyn supporter. Also against unnecessary genital mutilation of ALL CHILDREN, regardless of gender or religion.

UK/Zambia
Joined July 2014

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Reyos Blackwoood‏ @ReyosB Oct 15
      Replying to @ReyosB @politicoid_us and

      4> "The true incidence of complications after newborn circumcision is unknown." and given that many of the issues circumcision causes aren't immediate and aren't connected to the circumcision, like painfully tight erections in adults who have dealt with it all their life. >>

      2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
    2. kir‏ @politicoid_us Oct 15
      Replying to @ReyosB @BSR163 and

      You talk a lot, but understand little. You need to understand how medical science works, before you can understand specific research results.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. BSR‏ @BSR163 Oct 15
      Replying to @politicoid_us @ReyosB and

      So you're saying @ReyosB doesn't understand? Which of his tweets' statements were incorrect - and why? Don't try the "I'm superior to you because I understand how medical science works and you don't" approach while ignoring his valid comments. It makes you look pretentious/dumb.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    4. kir‏ @politicoid_us Oct 15
      Replying to @BSR163 @ReyosB and

      They weren't valid. They showed a clear lack of understanding of how medical science works.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Vaetan Thought‏ @VaetanThought Oct 16
      Replying to @politicoid_us @BSR163 and

      "Appeal to authority. Appeal to authority. Appeal to authority. REEEEEEE-" Argue on your own merits instead of someone else's. You keep saying we don't understand while you don't reference a single point from the article.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    6. kir‏ @politicoid_us Oct 16
      Replying to @VaetanThought @BSR163 and

      You're confusing an appeal to authority and the citation of research.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. BSR‏ @BSR163 Oct 16
      Replying to @politicoid_us @VaetanThought and

      Morris's 'research' is often fabricated. And referenced in his other papers, which are then referenced in other papers... He relies on the fact that his nested references are difficult to validate. Friendly peer reviewers don't stand a chance of cutting through his obfuscations.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    8. kir‏ @politicoid_us Oct 16
      Replying to @BSR163 @VaetanThought and

      So you're saying that his coauthors were willing to risk their career publishing fabricated research? Yes or no?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. BSR‏ @BSR163 Oct 16
      Replying to @politicoid_us @VaetanThought and

      His co-authors can speak for themselves. Quite telling that Royal Australasian College of Physicians said "After extensive review of the literature, the Paed's & Child Health Division of RACP has concluded that there is no medical reason for routine newborn male circumcision."

      2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
    10. kir‏ @politicoid_us Oct 16
      Replying to @BSR163 @VaetanThought and

      Either the paper is valid or his coauthors are risking their career. Which do you believe is the case?

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      BSR‏ @BSR163 Oct 16
      Replying to @politicoid_us @VaetanThought and

      The paper is utterly flawed. Conclude what you like about his co-authors and their careers. The vast majority of global medical experts and western medical bodies do not hold his views on routine neonatal circumcision (without medical indication).

      6:00 PM - 16 Oct 2018
      • 1 Like
      • Reyos Blackwoood
      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. kir‏ @politicoid_us Oct 17
          Replying to @BSR163 @VaetanThought and

          Please give a specific flaw from the paper.

          6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. BSR‏ @BSR163 Oct 17
          Replying to @politicoid_us @VaetanThought and

          "We estimated that more than 1 in 2 uncircumcised males will experience an adverse foreskin-related medical condition over their lifetime". Utter tosh.

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
        4. kir‏ @politicoid_us Oct 18
          Replying to @BSR163 @VaetanThought and

          That's your inability to accept their findings, not a flaw in the study. You, quite ltierally, are an uneducated fool, looking to pick apart a systematic review, which is a type of study that you know nothing about. Tell me, have you ever even take a fucking biology course?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. BSR‏ @BSR163 Oct 18
          Replying to @politicoid_us @VaetanThought and

          You know nothing about me, my level of education. I have no desire to share with you any details of my medical training. Oh, and if you're going to accuse someone of being an 'uneducated fool', you might first want to remove your own spelling mistakes from that accusing sentence.

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
        6. BSR‏ @BSR163 Oct 18
          Replying to @BSR163 @politicoid_us and

          You: "Please give a specific flaw from the paper." Me: Here are some examples... <PROVIDES A SELECTION OF EXAMPLES> You: <IGNORES EXAMPLES> <GETS ABUSIVE> <COMPLAINS> "...looking to pick apart a systematic review..."

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        7. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. BSR‏ @BSR163 Oct 17
          Replying to @BSR163 @politicoid_us and

          Here's an example. The Royal Dutch Medical Association: http://knmg.artsennet.nl/Diensten/knmgpublicaties/KNMGpublicatie/Nontherapeutic-circumcision-of-male-minors-2010.htm … Are all those Dutch doctors risking their careers by being emphatically against neonatal circ? They have access to the same scientific papers as Morris yet reached different conclusions?pic.twitter.com/52zmHZtegt

          1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes
        3. Ciferknight‏ @ciferknight Oct 17
          Replying to @BSR163 @politicoid_us and

          Okay, I just need to ask this. Was anyone in this thread arguing that circumcision is a good thing? because from what I've read it seems that everyone is on the same page here, yet there's a back-and-forth going on.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. kir‏ @politicoid_us Oct 17
          Replying to @ciferknight @BSR163 and

          I've provided two systematic reviews which indicate benefits of male circumcision. They were ignored, in much the same way that research justifying vaccines is ignored.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. kir‏ @politicoid_us Oct 18
          Replying to @politicoid_us @ciferknight and

          And we're really not on the same page here. This science denying moron ignores systematic review of clinical research. You fucks are dumber that half the anti-vaxx people I've met, and that's saying something.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. BSR‏ @BSR163 Oct 18
          Replying to @politicoid_us @ciferknight and

          We're not on the same page here. Because: 1) You are clearly of the opinion that all systematic reviews are beyond criticism. 2) You (had) no knowledge of the principle author's reputation for statistical manipulation, bias and constant self-referencing.

          0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        7. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info