-
-
-
Gone. My understanding is they couldn’t work out a way to add it such that it preserves secrecy without adding an additional round trip
-
recurring theme, shaving off a round trip in the name of dont-care-about-that-metadata
-
To be fair, a round trip on a mobile device with today's bloated websites is meaningfully expensive.
-
i'm just frustrated with the privileged being greedy over milliseconds while putting others at risk
-
I think it could be the difference between secure websites being usable or not by some % of people connecting from the fringes.
-
saving a round trip would make more people able to tls? interesting. my frustration is about saving state being detrimental to user privacy.
-
https://danluu.com/web-bloat/ In general I think for given packet loss we would expect additional round trips to increase timeouts exponentially
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
use extra small initial window to bypass SNI filter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if/when TLS 1.3 encrypts SNI, they'll probably block using DNS RPZ.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...which is why I think that the initial handshake needs to be unauthenticated, then the full Certificate/extensions transfer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who is “Spain” in this equation? Telefonica?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.