Hmm, I've always interpreted it as FIPS 180-4, which is truncated 512 with its own special IV.
Replying to @colmmacc
Me too. But it seems the recent advocacy is for truncating but with the same SHA-512 IV. NIST spec for SHA-512/256 says that is also OK.
12:39 PM - 2 Jun 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.