Please RT if you have enough expertise to understand why blocking screenshots is a pointless, silly feature for a secure messenger.
-
-
What should we do if we have enough expertise to understand why it isn't a pointless, silly feature?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
seriously I'm just tweeting distracted and wording things clumsily. You LIKE those features?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If I were a founder of
@snap I would, considering how much money they made.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BRIAN_____ @tqbf and
They're basically security theater, and their absence doesn't make an app insecure.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CiPHPerCoder @BRIAN_____ and
Whether or not a feature is profitable has very little to do with its security.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CiPHPerCoder @tqbf and
That's not the question that was asked. Developers of secure messengers need money.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BRIAN_____ @tqbf and
It's pointless and silly for the stated goal of making a messenger secure.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CiPHPerCoder @BRIAN_____ and
Claiming "Signal is insecure because it doesn't block screenshots" like journos did is patently stupid.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I'm not disagreeing with you. This thread isn't about Signal, AFAIK.
-
-
Replying to @BRIAN_____ @tqbf and
Scott Arciszewski Retweeted Maggie Haberman
Scott Arciszewski added,
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.