Please RT if you have enough expertise to understand why blocking screenshots is a pointless, silly feature for a secure messenger.
That's not the question that was asked. Developers of secure messengers need money.
-
-
It's pointless and silly for the stated goal of making a messenger secure.
-
Claiming "Signal is insecure because it doesn't block screenshots" like journos did is patently stupid.
-
I'm not disagreeing with you. This thread isn't about Signal, AFAIK.
New conversation -
-
-
the profit motive doesn't exactly apply to Signal. OWS is a non-profit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.