I don't know it would, I see no efforts considering moving off k1 despite it's known issues.
-
-
Which known issues?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BRIAN_____ @indutny
I'm referring to https://safecurves.cr.yp.to related analysis; not suggesting it's urgent but migration takes time.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's easy to come to misleading conclusions by reading that website. :)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BRIAN_____ @rmhrisk
I think that website does pretty good job at advertising curve25519
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I just stumbled across somebody else making the same point: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=289795.msg7796974#msg7796974 …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BRIAN_____
@ not same point.
@indutny was saying that if bitcoin used SHA1 we would've been migrated off by now.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
My point was that I see no evidence that they are planning cryptographic migrations ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
which I think is the take time, especially in an ecosystem.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I understand that being a few bits of weaker and a lacking some desirable properties does not mean K1 is broken.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You could substitute "Ed25519" for "K1" in that sentence and it would be equally accurate.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.