If that's V8's position it was not represented yesterday at TC39 meeting. I think we're just tweeting fools :-/
*If* you're willing to write modulus-specific reductions, you can sometimes do it faster.
-
-
exactly! And we are willing to do it in many cases.
-
Every implementation would (optionally) special-case Curve25519. Good enough.
-
could you please elaborate on this? I’m not sure what you mean by this
-
When the modulus is Curve25519's, it would use special reduction, if it really cares.
-
I see. However with default BigInt implementation doing this may be troublesome
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.