Mea Culpa. More transparency about Certificate Transparency -https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/ct-policy/AH9JHYDljpU/f4I9vQLACwAJ …
It is risky in the sense that your log can become useless overnight given even a small mistake.
-
-
But logs come and go - why is that risky?
-
Maybe not risky to the broader PKI, but if the risk of disqual is high to the log owner, could suppress log creation.
-
Yes, exactly. Unlikely that you build a log and it's still trusted a year from now, w/o spending millions.
-
Disagree on the figure :) But there's definitely an aspect here of balancing self-interest and ecosystem interest
-
Devs to build a fully-distributed/redundant system are expensive. Anything less than that seems like guaranteed failure.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.