@BRIAN_____ Who told you that? A raw pointer definitely isn't treated as volatile. It would make everything incredibly slow.
-
-
Replying to @CopperheadOS1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @BRIAN_____
@BRIAN_____ They're probably talking about the noalias (restrict) markers. You can use `rustc --emit=llvm-ir` to see what it outputs.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CopperheadOS
@BRIAN_____ Rust's raw pointers are a friendlier version of C pointers since there's no TBAA and only LLVM's arithmetic and aliasing rules.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @CopperheadOS
@CopperheadSec …has changed how volatile works across releases. For example, atomics used to be implicitly volatile and now they're not.
5:28 PM - 18 Feb 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.