@sleevi_ @ServidaAndrea and falling under multiple policies means complying with union of policies not the intersection. (1.5/2)
-
-
Replying to @pzb
@sleevi_@ServidaAndrea what is missing is an open and transparent commercial Internet policy authority (2/2)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pzb
@pzb@ServidaAndrea I would disagree; Mozilla's program fits openness and transparency1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sleevi_
@sleevi_@ServidaAndrea Mozilla's program is a very good base. Needs to fill out gaps, which requires more staffing and resources.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pzb
@pzb@ServidaAndrea Needs more staff to be open and transparent?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sleevi_
@sleevi_@ServidaAndrea no, to identify and close gaps like basic reqs for all certs issued by CAs in prog and email cert reqs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pzb
@sleevi_@ServidaAndrea would also be great to have "staff" opinion published on each CA application + each annual audit report; scale you:)1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @pzb
@pzb@sleevi_@ServidaAndrea Mozilla should just write 1 CP/CPS & then say "You can be in our program if this is your CP/CPS, otherwise no."2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @BRIAN_____
@BRIAN_____@pzb@ServidaAndrea Ah, but then CAs would complain they can't comply with eIDAS and Moz... Like they do today2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sleevi_
@sleevi_@pzb@ServidaAndrea Just don't let any of the eIDAS CAs in. Problem solved.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@sleevi_ @pzb @ServidaAndrea “Any mention ‘eIDAS’ in your application or in any message on this mailing list results in automatic DQ.”
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.