C problems: Spend time to ensure you are not writing a bug if sizeof(size_t) != sizeof(void*) or spend time to find out if that case exists.
-
-
Replying to @hsivonen
I'll take
@BRIAN_____'s advice on the sizeof(size_t) issue. https://users.rust-lang.org/t/are-libc-declarations-useful-for-obviously-sized-primitive-types/4194/6 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hsivonen
@hsivonen That is Rust-specific. For C[++], use uintptr_t, as I do: https://github.com/briansmith/ring/commit/8645dd7c1b4228f8d9851f63a0bcb9527f3d4363 … https://github.com/briansmith/ring/commit/400f5053580881ade84af648717a5602567f0556 … https://github.com/briansmith/ring/commit/a6ffa1dd51ac5630e2c7855009b7073d77848fd0 …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BRIAN_____
@BRIAN_____ But see http://stackoverflow.com/a/1846648 for the non-guarantee.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.