Also, @metromoxie has implemented a pass at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-leave-secure-cookies-alone …. We might still tweak the eviction rules, but secure now means secure.
-
-
@BRIAN_____: They're equivalent, right? Eviction happens when inserting a cookie exceeds a limit, and we evict non-secure first.@metromoxieThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BRIAN_____: So if inserting a non-secure cookie would trigger eviction, _it_ would be removed.@metromoxie -
@mikewest@metromoxie "it" = the new non-secure cookie? If so, I agree that's what should happen; It's not clear that that's what spec says. -
@BRIAN_____: We agree on the expectation, so I'm happy to clarify in the spec. What would you like it to say?@metromoxie -
@mikewest@metromoxie Call out the case where eviction is triggered by insertion, noting the to-be-inserted cookie needs to be considered.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.