Should *http://band.example.com and playground*.example.net be allowed as FQDNs in certificates?
-
-
@BRIAN_____@mik235@sleevi_ while you are changing the BRs, how about requiring only one Attribute per RelativeDistinguishedName? -
@pzb@BRIAN_____@mik235 Dude, CAs can't even follow basic ASN.1 rules. Now you're going to go all crazy and ask for no stupidity?! -
@pzb@BRIAN_____@mik235 I mean, it's totally valid to supply multiple attributes per RDN if they're equivalent. I was more talking bout.. -
@sleevi_@BRIAN_____@mik235 are you suggesting that InfoNotary cert is correct? -
@pzb@BRIAN_____@mik235 Hah, no, those are total violations of basic rules of equivalency ;) Just not my biggest grumble of CA stupidity
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@BRIAN_____@mik235@pzb Did https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=434960 … , but yes, the point of the BRs is to be the common reqs.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.