@BRIAN_____ @tqbf It wasn't us who proposed this "there can be only one" CFRG process.
-
-
@BRIAN_____@tqbf this captures the "anyone who proposes anything other than 25519 is being unhelpful" argument nicely -
@marshray@BRIAN_____ When the effort starts with “let’s adopt 25519” and is derailed by “let’s also consider…”, that’s a legit complaint. -
@tqbf@BRIAN_____ I am engaging in this thread precisely to explain that's very not how it showed up in my office ~7 months ago -
@marshray@BRIAN_____ Fair enough. Sorry. I’ll stop free-radicaling. -
@tqbf@BRIAN_____ The very 1st thing I did was gauge adoption by listing of uses of 25519 that didn't have direct involvement by AGL or DJB. -
@tqbf@BRIAN_____ Do you want to know what I came up with? Cryptocat, that's what. I rest my case. -
@marshray@BRIAN_____ Wait, what? OpenSSH uses it, as does Tor. -
@tqbf@BRIAN_____ I'll give you Tor but it appears to still be not yet standard SSH https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-josefsson-tls-curve25519-06 … - 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.