@tqbf true, but I guess those peeps do? :P
-
-
@BRIAN_____@trevp__@kyhwana@tqbf http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2104#section-5 … "A well-known practice with msg authentication codes is to truncate the output" -
-
-
@BRIAN_____@marshray@trevp__@kyhwana@tqbf Once you assume the underlying compression function is a PRF, you assume the rest from there. -
@justintroutman@BRIAN_____@marshray@trevp__@kyhwana@tqbf don't most HMAC security proofs have to assume underlying comp. fn is a PRF? -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.