@tqbf Isn't doing that a NIST standard thingy they say is ok? hmm
-
-
Replying to @kyhwana1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @BRIAN_____
@kyhwana@tqbf If you take papers like this to be part of a conversation, I think what they are saying is reasonable:1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BRIAN_____
@kyhwana@tqbf They said they couldn't find a proof and implied (IIUC) a little that truncation may not be necessary every place it is used.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BRIAN_____
@BRIAN_____@kyhwana OTOH: truncation of MACs is a basic design feature of most MAC constructions, right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BRIAN_____
@BRIAN_____@tqbf@kyhwana truncated PRF is still a PRF, HMAC is a PRF, PRFs are MACs, this is trivial.1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @trevp__
@trevp__@brian_____@kyhwana@tqbf It used to be considered an open question whether truncated md5/sha1 was ok. Nist fixed that.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.