I agree. Though to be care, In C++ one rarely has to keep track of things manually, in modern codebases. Our experience maintaining a gigantic performance-sensitive legacy app that predates even the first ISO C++ (IIRC) biases us too much against C++.
What's wrong with the Oilpan approach? (Honest question. I don't understand the limitations of Oilpan as they don't seem to be documented.)
-
-
In particular, I think one aspect of the Oilpan approach is "Don't use `Vec` or `std::vector`; you must use the Oilpan counterpart."
-
Same with Servo. That’s the ergonomic tax I was talking about though: I want something automatic that lets you write regular old Rust or C++, not weird-Servo-DOM-flavored Rust. I may not ever get what I want, but it doesn’t stop me from wanting it :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.