This "mini-review" into ivermectin for COVID-19 was recently published concluding that ivermectin is effective and should be used for the disease A brief peer-review 1/npic.twitter.com/KdxoQlqkXA
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I am not being paid a cent to do any of this work. I have absolutely no idea what you mean by "money", but I will admit it is absolutely bizarre that unpaid researchers are looking into issues with the literature rather than the people promoting the drug
Why is challenging a paper a bad idea? If you're so confident in it, then you should be confident in being able to address the specific points of contention rather than what you have done. Good science is able to stand up to scrutiny. If not, then why not.
No. Also hilarious from part of the ivm-pushing astroturfing network.
If so why is Dexamethasone - a drug from the 50's - being used as a treatment against Covid-19 at the hospitals? Why didn't Big Pharma prevent that?
Find us money going into suppressing ivermectin. I’ll wait.
No, now accuse the Cochrane group of COIs. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID-19 infection…”https://www.cochrane.org/CD015017/INFECTN_ivermectin-preventing-and-treating-covid-19 …
Could it be that you are not able to respond to the specific critiques that have been made? That would be much more productive for your cause.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.